Digital public administration infrastructure and its effectiveness

Keywords: public administration, digital infrastructure, efficiency, system analysis, professional qualities.


Digital innovation in public administration is critical. It’s necessary to work effectively with the digital resources of public servants. In Russia, successes are observed, requirements for IT competencies of employees, interactive interactions with infrastructure are increased, motivation is updated - the balance of state and corporate interests and the employee. The purpose of the work is a systematic analysis of problems and some solutions with "leadership in results". It’s also relevant to assess the evolutionary potential of infrastructure, not only the requirements of a state institution. The work uses methods of system analysis, decision-making, situational and comparative analysis and others. Our main results are the analysis of key tasks, the solution of which is assigned to the digital infrastructure of public administration. In particular, analysis of monitoring and identification of risk states, anomalies, opening of hidden vulnerabilities, situational forecasting, analytical support, reduction of resource consumption (costs), audit of population satisfaction, quality of work of employees, systematic automation and intellectualization of public administration was carried out. All this supports strategic management, develops performance indicators. A table of professional qualities, the development of competencies of the state manager has been built. The problem of "noises", uncertainties in decision-making is considered, because adaptation to "noise effects" in public administration can be accompanied by an increase in the homogeneity of decision-making employees and an increase in their differentiation, as well as a decrease in their number. The role of institutional, social and personal barriers, motivation, as a balance between the interests of a state institution and an employee, when both are interested in improving internal indicators, as well as involving citizens and organizations in the provision of public services, was noted.

Author Biography

Aleksandr Mikhailovich Romanenkov, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-university) Moscow, Russia.

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of the Philological Faculty Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-university) Moscow, Russia.


Arrow, J. (1994) Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge. American Economic Review, 84 (2), 8-12.

Bryson, I., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, I. (2014) Public Value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and new public management. Public administration Review, 74 (4), 445–456.

Dobrolyubova, E. (2018). Public Administration on Results in the Era of Digital Transformation: an Overview of Foreign Experience and Prospects for Russia. Issues of State and Municipal Administration, 4, 71-93.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, N., Basfow, S., & Tinkler, I. (2006) New Public. Management is Dead – Long Live Digital – Era. Governance Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 16 (3), 467–494.

Janssen, E.F. (2013) Lean Government and Platform Based Governance – Doing More with Less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq. 2012.11.003

Kaziev, V., Kazieva, B., & Gedgafofa, I. (2018) Modelling of investment attractiveness and Economic stability of region // SCTCMG 2018 International Scientific Conference «Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism»,

Kleiner, G. (2018). Humanistic management, social management, system management - the path to management of the 21st century. Russian Management Journal, 16 (2), 231-252. DOI:

Kudrjavceva, E. (2013) Management of competencies in the public civil service system. Management consulting, 6 (54), 22-31.

Lindgren, L., & van Veenstra, A. (2018) Digital Government Transformation: a case Illustrating Public E-service Development as Part of Public Sector Transformation. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. DOI: 10.1145/3209281.3209302

Morozov, A. (2018) Alternative sources of statistical information as a basis for political decision-making. Issues of public and municipal administration, 2, 50-70.

Petrov, M., Burov, V., Shklyaruk, M., & Sharov, A. (2018) State as a platform. A state for the digital economy. Digital transformation. Moscow: CSR, 209.

Sizova, Yu. S. (2019) Modern entrepreneur in the VUCA world - advantages and complexities. Journal of Economy and Business, 8, 145-150. DOI: 10.24411/2411-0450-2019-11131

Staut, L. (2002) Leadership: from mysteries to practice. Moscow: Good book, 320.

Vasil’eva, E., Puljeva, V., & Udina, V. (2018) Development of digital competencies of civil servants of the Russian Federation. Business informatics, 4 (46), 28-42. DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2018.4.28.42

Ydjakov, V., Talapina, E., Kluchkova, E., & Efremov, A. (2017) Public administration in the field of stimulating the development of information technologies: problems and areas of improvement. Journal of legal research, 2 (3), 89-100.
How to Cite
Romanenkov, A. M. (2021). Digital public administration infrastructure and its effectiveness. Personality Society, 2(3), 4-10.